Earth-Save

A Balanced Approach to Saving Mother Earth

Archive for the ‘Controversy’ Category

Photo by jaylopez, used under license I do believe we are getting warmer.  I’ve been keeping an almanac since 2000, and many natural events — such as the arrival of hummingbirds, bluebirds, deerflies, mayflowers, forsythia, etc. — are occurring at least a week earlier in the spring now than just a decade before.  Of course, like global temperature readings over the past century, my information is not scientifically precise.  But I don’t need lab measurements to confirm what I’m witnessing with my own eyes.  And the data from the extremes of our Earth such as towns in Alaska that are collapsing in melting permafrost is irrefutable.  The world is indeed heating up.

But it’s debatable whether this is just a normal cyclic event or an irreversible trend.  In spite of all the scientific evidence, there’s no irrefutable proof at this point, and many skeptics remain.  And it’s also debatable how much impact humans have.  It’s ridiculous to think that humans have no effect on our environment.  But it’s unclear whether our pollution is the primary cause of the recent warming or just one of many contributing factors.  Again, there is currently no way to know for sure with our limited data, scientific knowledge and computational power.

That said, we are humans who have been blessed with incredible pattern recognition capabilities and intuition.  Like the frog sitting in the slowly boiling pot of water, we notice it’s getting warmer and the bubbles are starting to form.  We have no conclusive proof that it’s warmer or whether it will continue, but it sure seems like it is.  So do we just sit and do nothing and wait until we boil to death?  Or do we get smart about our future and jump out of the pot?  (Note that the “boiling frog” theory itself appears to be false — who can you believe these days about anything?)

Hopefully as smart humans we will recognize that our endless pollution and reliance on fossil fuels is wrong on so many levels — environment, economy, security, geopolitics, health.  It’s essential that we start cleaning up our act and looking for a better way to fuel our future.  The one major downside to the global warming debate is it has enough ambiguity and uncertainty that skeptics can use it as an excuse inject FUD, do nothing and keep business as usual.  And that’s the real climate catastrophe.

Helicopter Wolf KillsThe National Park Service (NPS) is concerned about Alaska’s new predator control effort of shooting wolves from helicopters.  The Alaskan Department of Fish and Game began killing wolves Saturday to boosting caribou numbers in the state.  The goal is to shoot as many as 150 wolves before they eat too many caribou calves and before the snow and wolf tracks disappear.  The state has killed at least 30 wolves so far.

But NPS officials questioned what the shooting will mean for wolves who travel between state land and a neighboring 2.5-million-acre national preserve.  They also worry that the state overestimated how many wolves live in the area and will kill too many.

“We don’t want to see the wolf population, or those packs that frequent the Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve, be eliminated or reduced significantly,” said Debora Cooper, NPS associate regional director for natural resources.

After meeting with the head of the national preserve last week, the state agreed not to shoot wolves wearing NPS research radio collars, and to limit shooting wolf packs that are known to move in and out of the preserve, said regional Fish and Game supervisor David James.  “We’re not trying to eradicate the wolf population,” he said.

Defenders of Wildlife, a national environmental group that targeted Governor Sarah Palin’s support of aerial hunting, criticized the new helicopter kill.  “This is an extreme response to what has never been more than an arbitrary target with no scientific backing.  There is no biological emergency to justify this kind of action.”

Story at Anchorage Daily News

More National Park News

A surprise press release by the National Park Service launched a national controversy.  Acting NPS Director Dan Wenk announced the park service is going lead free.  “Our goal is to eliminate the use of lead ammunition and lead fishing tackle in parks by the end of 2010,” Wenk stated in the release.  “We want to take a leadership role in removing lead from the environment.”

The ambiguous press release dropped a bomb on sportsmen’s and conservation groups across the country.  “The National Park Service’s decision is arbitrary, over-reactive and not based on science,” said Steve Sanetti, president of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, a trade association for the firearms and ammunition industry.  “Studies show that traditional ammunition does not pose a health risk to humans, or wildlife populations as a whole.”

Turns out the uproar was all for naught.  David Barna, NPS chief of Public Affairs, said it’s not a rule change at all, but rather an in-house decision.  “It’s an announcement to let the public know that the PARK SERVICE intends to go to non-lead shot in our weapons and non-lead fishing gear in the work that we do,” said Barna.  “It’s not a requirement or regulation for our visitors.  We’re just announcing that’s the direction we’re going and we’re encouraging the public to do the same.”

Story at West Virginia Outdoor News